The Productivity Paradox

• It is not flattering to see oneself as a numerator.
• Framing work purely in productivity terms leads to awkward conversations about resourcing and can trigger a demotivating, self-fulfilling cycle of distrust.

The more people get context, the more they can understand what they contribute to (adherence), what needs to be done (adaptation), and their role in it (responsibility).

Context is essential for empowering teams. Without it, efficiency and engagement falter.

Balance is key. Regular, consistent communication (e.g., stand-ups) helps manage this.

• Not enough context can lead teams to infer reality… too much context may lead to anxiety and confusion.

Paradoxically, increasing productivity requires moments when productivity is not the main concern.

Stepping back from relentless efficiency to reflect on culture and values can lead to deeper, more sustainable productivity.

Productivity improves when people feel trusted, responsible, and aligned—not when they’re micromanaged.

Cultural awareness around productivity practices fosters responsibility by design…

Shifting the focus from individual output to collective purpose rehumanizes work and builds cohesion.

• It may enable teams to address the deep-seated alienation of working towards achieving targets, rather than contributing to a common endeavor.